Uber is currently being sued [PDF] in federal court by three drivers seeking to represent a much larger class of 160,000 current and former drivers in California. The plaintiffs believe that Uber is depriving them of gratuities given by passengers and that they are incorrectly being treated as independent contractors who are responsible for all the maintenance, gas, and other costs associated with their vehicles.
But Uber is claiming that these plaintiffs don’t accurately represent Uber drivers. Yesterday, the company filed its opposition [PDF] to granting the complaint class-action status, and included declarations from 400 different employees to back up their side of the story.
“When I am using the Uber app, I am driving for myself and not for Uber,” reads one statement from a driver in the San Francisco area. “The best part of using the Uber app is the freedom and flexibility it gives me. In my experience, you give away your freedom when you become an employee, and that is something I have no interest in doing.”
“I am a partner with Uber; I don’t work for Uber,” says a driver who also works full time in human resources for a food distributor in the Bay Area. “I can turn my app on and off at any time. I don’t have any supervisors to report to or answer to.”
A former San Diego taxi driver declares that he left that gig to enjoy the flexibility he saw with being an Uber driver.
“When I was a taxi cab driver, you could not take a day off,” he writes. “Even if you were sick or wanted to visit your family, it was really difficult. I leased my taxi at a rate of about $65 to $70 a day on a weekly basis. That would make it very hard to take a day off. Now I can take a day off, spend time with family, think about going to school or taking another job, even clean my room.”
And they pretty much go on like that for a few hundred more examples. This PDF has 100+ pages of declarations submitted to court and it’s just gets through drivers whose last names begin with “A.”
Aside from presenting sunny stories to the court, Uber used these drivers’ declarations to make the argument that each driver’s interactions and use of the platform was different, thus making it difficult — in Uber’s eyes — for the plaintiffs to claim that they represent the interests of all the state’s drivers.
The plaintiffs’ attorney downplays the significance of these drivers’ stories.
“More than a thousand drivers have contacted our firm who are very unhappy with how Uber has treated them,” she told Reuters.
To the San Francisco Chronicle, the lawyer explained, “The mere fact that drivers can choose their hours does not make them independent contractors.”
by Chris Morran via Consumerist
No comments:
Post a Comment