Menu

Friday, August 5, 2016

Should “Locked” Digital Content Be Labeled So You Know What You’re Buying?

http://ift.tt/2b90dwb

Have you ever “purchased” an ebook, mp3, or video only to found you can only access it on a certain number or type of devices, or that it must be played through a specific player, or only accessed when you’re connected to the internet? Maybe that’s the sort of thing you’d like to know before you paid for this content.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation — along with a coalition of publishers, consumer advocates, and other interested parties — have written to the Federal Trade Commission asking it to require that “locked” digital content be labeled accordingly.

Pointing to the digital rights management (DRM) restrictions placed on content bought from Amazon, Google, Apple, and elsewhere, the letter [PDF] argues that the “confusing spectrum of restrictions” placed on digital content prevents shoppers from making an informed choice about what they are buying.

The issue of DRM and copyright protection is divisive in the media community. On one end of the spectrum is the argument that DRM is necessary to protect content creators by preventing rampant, illegal duplication and distribution. If you can make infinite, pristine copies of the same file and share them globally in a matter of seconds, what’s to stop you?

At the other end are those who contend that DRM is anti-consumer and anti-competitive, inextricably tying the buyer to the seller of the content. Can you imagine buying a paperback book at Barnes & Noble and then being told when, where, and how you can read it? Or buying a movie at West Coast Video (RIP) only to have a West Coast staffer come to your house a few months later and snatch it off your shelves because the store’s license to sell that video lapsed?

“The use of DRM is controversial among creators; studios, publishers and labels; and audiences,” acknowledges EFF’s Cory Doctorow in the letter. “What should not be controversial is that a purchaser should be able to tell whether she is buying a DRM-encumbered product before she spends her money.”

The letter accuses the companies that use DRM of wanting to have things both ways — pointing to the fact that consumers are buying locked content as evidence that DRM is acceptable to consumers, while simultaneously claiming that a DRM label would hurt sales.

“If, on the other hand, some customers are unaware of DRM at the point of purchase, they are being mis-sold a product that comes with unexpected, unpredictable restrictions,” writes Doctorow.

The groups signing on to the letter aren’t asking for some huge sticker or burst — or even that shoppers would have to acknowledge they are purchasing DRM-locked content. Instead, it could be as simple as adding a category to the details listed for a piece of content.

The letter gives this side-by-side example of how a book would be listed on Amazon:

If there were DRM on that title, it would read “DRM Restricted” with a link to more details about those restrictions.

“Without DRM labeling, it’s nearly impossible to figure out which products have digital locks and what restrictions these locks impose,” explains Doctorow in an emailed statement. “Customers have a right to know about these restrictions before they part with their money, not after.”


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Traveler Hacks His Way Into Fancy Airport Lounges

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Is it possible to hack your way into a lounge? Of course it is, when access to an airline’s elite frequent-flyer lounges is controlled via barcode. One traveler couldn’t get into the lounge when he had gold status, and wondered whether he could encode a barcode with fake information that would gain him access that he didn’t deserve.

The barcode readers, it turns out, aren’t as smart as you might think. They aren’t connected to the ticketing system or anything that actually verifies a passenger’s status. That means all he needs to encode in each fake boarding pass is a flight number and a name, and a seat number in first or business class.

As long as the system recognizes these things, it understands the fake boarding pass and lets him in. Only people holding (cheaper) tickets for a real flight or airport employees who have access past the security line would be able to use this app, which he has no plans to release to the public.

He does, however, plan to present the project at Defcon this weekend. Presumably he’s hanging out in a first-class airport lounge on his way to Las Vegas right now. Here’s a motion sickness-inducing video that shows the process, then him gaining access to the super-fancy Turkish Airlines lounge in Istanbul based on the a number of a flight he wasn’t taking.

Fake Boarding Pass App Gets Hacker Into Fancy Airline Lounges [Wired] (via Gizmodo)


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

United Airlines Revamping Some Fees For MileagePlus Members

http://ift.tt/2aX8dnr

Determining what fees you’ll have to pay when making changes to your United Airlines itinerary is about to get a bit slightly less complicated for MileagePlus members, as the airline recently unveiled it would create one set of fees for changing and canceling flights. 

The airline announced this week that it will try to streamline things for these frequent fliers by creating one set of fees for changing and canceling flights.

The changes, which will apply to flights booked after Oct. 6, provide members with fees based on how close the new travel date is to their or original itinerary.

For the most part, the changes drop the price members will pay to have an itinerary changed. Gold and Silver members will see a $25 drop in their fees, while general MileagePlus members will see their fees drop from $200 to $125, Forbes reports.

However, in some cases the the amount of time members have to make changes is shorter, and some groups that previously wouldn’t have paid a fee in that time frame now will.

For example, while a Premier Platinum member (collects over 75,000 miles annually) won’t pay anything to change their reward travel up to 61 days before departure, they will pay $50 to make changes if they are needed 60 days out from the scheduled travel date. Previously, these member only paid a fee if changes were made within 21 days of their flight.

Here’s a chart of the new United Mileage Plus fees:

Screen Shot 2016-08-05 at 2.23.23 PM

Forbes reports that United is also revising its policy on international stopovers. The carrier will now allow members to use what it’s calling an Excursionist Perk.

The perk lets a member traveling overseas to make an additional stop without it requiring the use of extra reward miles.

[via Forbes]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Strap On Your Brain Belt: It’s Time For The Consumerist Quiz!

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

We write stories. You read them. It’s a purely transactional arrangement; no strings attached. Question is: How well do you remember what you’ve read? Take the Consumerist Quiz and find out.

We’re either getting soft on you or you’re all getting better at taking the quiz. Once again, the median score from last week was an impressive 67%.

(NOTE: That’s much better than the 40% median on yesterday’s “Better Know a Bureaucrat” test. Your high school civics teacher would be disappointed… wait — do they still teach civics?)

Anyway. We think this week’s will be a brain-buster for those who haven’t been taking notes (or who don’t cheat). Only one way to find out:


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Laptop-Using Car Theft Ring Busted In Houston

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Hey, remember those car thefts in Houston where the suspect was caught on security cameras fiddling with a laptop computer before driving off with the vehicles? The police say that they’ve found the culprits, who allegedly were able to drive off with the vehicles by programming blank key fobs with codes that they obtained through illicit access to the Fiat Chrysler database. Police say that the men have stolen 100 Jeep and Dodge vehicles from the Houston area, somehow shipping them across the border to Mexico.

The alleged thefts happened at night, and police believethat they went down just like the one caught on camera a month ago. The suspect got in the car, used a laptop computer briefly, and then drove away.

How would the suspects have gained access to the key codes for the automaker? A Fiat Chrysler Automobiles spokesperson told ABC (warning: auto-play video at that link) that the pair bought login credentials from an employee of a mechanic, dealership, or locksmith. The company hasn’t yet identified which account generated the key codes for the stolen vehicles.

Another mystery is how the suspects could have moved 100 cars to Mexico without catching the attention of any authorities.

For its part, Fiat Chrysler of America recommends that car owners keep their vehicles somewhere secure and lock the doors. The good news for the company is that the thefts don’t appear to have happened because one of the suspected thieves gained access to the car’s computer systems, like the hackers who accessed a Jeep Cherokee through its infotainment system and were able to control some features of the vehicle remotely.

Houston Police Believe More Than 100 Cars Stolen by High-Tech Thieves [ABC News] (Warning: auto-play video)


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

New Jersey Customers Complain To Utility Board For Hours About Crappy Verizon Service

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

In recent years, the relationship between Verizon and its legacy, copper-wire, landline-using customers in New Jersey has gotten… well, let’s politely call it “contentious.” Residents of the Garden State and the descendant of Ma Bell have found themselves at odds over everything from pricing to fiber rollout to disintegrating connections. So when the state gave those customers a chance to come out and have their say, well, they said a lot.

As NJ.com reports, the state’s Board of Public Utilities held a hearing yesterday at which Verizon customers could sign up to speak. Nearly 80 did, with another 200 residents showing up to listen and add their two cents.

The hearing, which started at 3:30, was supposed to break up at 6:30 so another meeting could take place. Instead, the two merged, and the litany of complaints against Verizon continued into the night.

One man with a chronic illness testified that he needs to be able to reach medical services 24/7, but that he can only call an ambulance on sunny days because when it rains, his Verizon service fails. And not just that, but Verizon is rubbish about fixing it: “I would call them in during a rainstorm,” he said, “and four days later they would come out, on a sunny day, and say the lines were all clear.”

Another customer, a woman who owns small businesses, said that her phones were barely functional, and held up a recording of a voicemail to prove her point. The sound? Nothing but crackling static.

The county where the hearing was held is representing a bunch of New Jersey communities in a petition to the Board of Public Utilities about Verizon’s deteriorating service in the region.

A Verizon representative said to NJ.com that Verizon has met its obligations, is not failing to adhere to regulations, and continues to maintain its infrastructure in the region. “Verizon strives every day to provide reliable service to our customers,” the executive said. “When we fall short, we work diligently to resolve all issues.”

Customers, however, clearly have a different opinion.

Further reading: Verizon in New Jersey

Hours of complaints at hearing about Verizon landline maintenance [NJ.com via Ars Technica]


by Kate Cox via Consumerist

State Wants Craft Brewers To Keep Info On Every Person They Sell Beer To

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Why would the state need to know your name, phone number, where you live, wand how old you are when you buy beer? It’s unclear, but that kind of detailed info is exactly what Alabama regulators have proposed craft brewers collect from anyone buying beer to bring home.

The Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board is considering a new rule [PDF] what would require brewers to collect that kind of information from anyone who purchases beer at a brewery for off-premise consumption, the Associated Press reports, and industry groups are not pleased: they’re calling it an invasion of privacy, and an administrative nightmare.

“As nonsensical as it might seem, this rule would essentially empower the ABC Board to come to an individual’s house to confirm his or her purchase of a six pack of beer,” Nick Hudson of Free The Hops, a grassroots organization, said in a statement this week.

The Alabama Brewers Guild also chimed in, saying collecting that kind of information would be a complicated endeavor, and could pose concerns about potential data breaches and government use of the information as well.

Regulators haven’t explained why it wants this information but ABG says the information would be used to verify enforcement of the state’s 288-ounce limit on the amount of brew anyone can purchase at one time.

“Individuals may not purchase more than 288 ounces a day from a brewery, and this provision would help the ABC Audit Division to ensure compliance,” the group said in a statement Thursday (h/t AL.com). “The ABC is trying to do their job, and we understand the reasoning. However, we believe there are less invasive ways to ensure compliance.”

The group says it will work with the ABC during this process, and will be submitting written input as part of the public comment period, which lasts through Sept. 7. The rule will be considered by the board on Sept. 28.

In June, a law took effect in the state that lets craft breweries sell six packs, large bottles, and other containers of beer like growlers to consumers, as long as they stayed within that daily limit of 288 ounces.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Did Burger King Rip Off Mac N’ Cheetos From The Vulgar Chef?

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but one online chef is calling foul when it comes to Burger King’s Mac n’ Cheetos. 

The concept of deep-frying macaroni and cheese leftovers is nothing new, but Kyle Marcoux — better known online as The Vulgar Chef — is now pointing out to FoodBeast that he posted his very particular method for making “Cheetos Crusted Mac N Chees Fries” nine months before Burger King

The Vulgar Chef lives up to his nickname in the FoodBeast interview, using his signature colorful language to vent about what he sees as a national fast food chain cashing in on an item strikingly similar to his creation.

“At first I was like what the f***? Like…you’re f****** Burger King,” he told FoodBeast. “It actually is a little flattering that a company as large as BK would take an idea from a fat, drunk, illiterate food blogger who is basically an Internet food troll. Kind of sad if you ask me.”

Marcoux says that the Mac n’ Cheese bites from Burger King are just too similar to his creation to be a coincidence.

The Vulgar Chef says he’s now added Burger King to his list of companies that have allegedly used his recipes. That list includes chains like Giordano’s and the Chicago Cubs, as well as media companies like BuzzFeed, FoodBeast reports.

He says keeping the list and being vocal when he feels a company uses his recipes is his way of sticking up for all food bloggers. He tells FoodBeast that he would be less upset if the company just came to him personally for help with recipes.

Of course, it’s entirely possible that BK and PepsiCo cooked up the idea of Mac n’ Cheetos on their own. After all, macaroni bites aren’t a new concept. However, using Cheetos dust as part of the recipe might be. We’ve reached out to Burger King about The Vulgar Chef’s accusations, we’ll update this post when we hear back.

You might be wondering, “if you’re so concerned why don’t you just patent your recipes?” But that’s no easy task, and it’s certainly one that Marcoux doesn’t have time for.

“I would literally have to copyright every single recipe I put out. At the end of the day someone is going to rip you off,” he tells FoodBeast. “So, I just keep plugging along and try to be ahead of the curve with my recipes.”

Patenting a recipe or a food composition is only possible under narrow circumstances, according to Legal Zoom.

“The recipe must be useful, novel and non-obvious,” the site says. “This three-prong test means that the greatest recipe in the world is not patentable unless it involves a food formulation or application that has not been used before and cannot be intuited by a cook merely tasting the final product.”

The recipe must also be entirely new, it can’t be an old family recipe or something cooked for the public in the past.

Instead of patenting a recipe, Legal Zoom notes that many restaurants or corporations will protect their recipes as a trade secret. By doing this, the company also doesn’t have to worry about divulging special ingredients during the public patent process.

This, of course, is how Kentucky Fried Chicken has kept the Colonel’s secret recipe, well, a secret for so long.

That, and the New York Times reports, the only copy is locked in a company safe, and the ingredients are said to be known only to a handful of employees who have signed confidentiality pledges.

While it’s possible that The Vulgar Chef could try to protect his recipes as trade secrets, that would almost entirely defeat the purpose of his channel.

Pissed Off Chef Has Proof Burger King Stole His Mac N’ Cheetos Idea [FoodBeast]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

FTC Sends Warning Letters To Online Marketers Peddling Ineffective Zika-Prevention Products

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

It’s been a busy week for authorities going after sham products: a day after the New York Attorney General’s office announced that six companies had agreed to stop selling products that are ineffective at warding off Zika-carrying mosquitoes, the Federal Trade Commission is reminding a slew of businesses marketing Zika-prevention products that it’s illegal to make health claims that simply aren’t true.

The FTC sent 10 warning letters [PDF] to online marketers that have been selling items that are supposed to provide some kind of protection from the Zika virus in an apparent attempt to take advantage of consumer concerns about the mosquito-borne virus.

The FTC warns the undisclosed companies that Zika protection claims have to be supported by actual, competent, reliable scientific evidence. That means well-controlled human clinical testing.

Much like the products the New York AG’s action targeted, the items for sale from these companies include wristbands, patches, and stickers that claim to repel Zika-carrying mosquitoes or otherwise protect users from the virus.

In order to make those kinds of assertions, any testing the businesses would do to prove that must use the same species of mosquito linked to Zika — Aedes aegypti — and demonstrate that the repellant works as long as it says it does.

The letters urge the companies to review the claims that they and their distributors are making, and delete or change them if they don’t have any scientific evidence to back it up.

In addition, the recipients are asked to report back to the FTC within 48 hours, “detailing the specific actions they have taken to remove or change potentially false, misleading, or unsupported claims.”

While it might be nice to slap a botanical patch on your arm and feel like you’re invisible to Zika-carrying mosquitoes, per the Centers for Disease Control, none of those patches, bands, or ultrasonic devices are effective. Instead, consumers should look for repellants containing DEET, Picardin, IR3535, oil of lemon eucalyptus, or para-menthane-diol.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Muslim Passengers Report Being Removed From Recent Delta, American Flights

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Recently, two sets of Muslim American travelers have reported being removed from Delta Air Lines and American Airlines flights after flight crew in both incidents said they felt uncomfortable.

In the first incident, a Cincinnati couple was traveling home from Paris on a Delta flight on July 26 after taking a 10-anniversary trip to London and Paris, Cincinnati.com reports. A crew member complained to the pilot that she was uncomfortable with the couple, saying the woman was wearing a head scarf and using her phone and the man was sweating.

The flight attendant claimed that the mans had tried to hide to hide his cell phone and that she’d heard them use the word “Allah,” which is the Arabic word for God. The pilot contacted the ground crew, and then a ground agent approached the couple.

“The ground agent said, `Can you step out with me? We’d like to ask you a few questions,’ “ the woman said. “So I said, `Do you want us to get our things?’ And he said, `Yes, please grab all of your personal belongings. You’re not going to be on this flight.’ ”

Delta paid for their flight at a nearby hotel, and they flew back to Cincinnati the next day, calling the experience “humiliating.”

Now, the Council on American-Islamic Relations is filing a complaint with the Department of Transportation’s Aviations Consumer Protection Division, claiming that the two passengers were singled out to be removed, and that Delta discriminated against the couple in violation of federal law.

“We call on the U.S. Department of Transportation to conduct a thorough examination into the prevailing practices of major American air carriers, including Delta Air Lines, and to develop policy guidelines on the objective factors that are to be considered when determining that a passenger may legally be removed from a flight,” CAIR-Cincinnati attorney Sana Hassan said on Thursday.

Shortly after, Delta released a statement saying it doesn’t condone discrimination, and will be looking into the situation.

“Delta condemns discrimination toward our customers in regards to age, race, nationality, religion, sexual orientation or gender,” the airline said. “As a global airline that brings hundreds of thousands of people together every day, Delta is deeply committed to treating all of our customers with respect. Delta continues its investigation into this matter and will issue a full refund of these customers’ airfare.”

In an another recent incident, two Muslim American women said they were taken off an American Airlines flight from Miami to Washington D.C. flight after discussing a lack of food and water with another passenger during a five-hour wait on the tarmac.

One of the women is a journalist, and posted her story on Facebook. She says her friend, a federal government worker who didn’t want to be named, was discussing the delay with a white male passenger seated behind her, The Independent Reports. That’s when a male flight attendant allegedly approached and said, “If you have a problem, you can get off the plane.” He also allegedly accused her of “instigating” objections from other passengers, and threatened to remove her from the plane.

The two took a picture of the attendant to try to identify him, saying he wasn’t wearing a badge and wouldn’t give his name. They were then told that taking a photo was a federal offense and a female flight attendant asked that they delete the passenger. An American Airlines customer relations representative boarded the plane and asked the women to follow her off the aircraft, where they were met by armed air marshals and police officers who said that the male flight attendant had felt threatened by them.

They were assigned seats on the next available flight and given $200 credit vouchers and a $24 food voucher.

“For being such a ‘threat’ to an AA attendant, it’s telling that the Miami-Dade police officers joked with us and posed for this picture with the ‘pretty harmless’ airplane menaces,’” the woman wrote on Facebook, posting a photo with police at the airport on Twitter as well.

In a statement, American told The Independent that that the passenger had violated the airline’s policy of videotaping and taking pictures of an attendant even though he reportedly asked them to stop.

“This was a case of non-compliance. At no moment did discrimination come up, according to the passenger relations representative who was there,” a spokeswoman said. “She told me they were very calm, very nice, they weren’t upset. They didn’t say they were being kicked off because they were Muslim. Those words never came out of their mouths. It’s only now that she’s saying this was an issue.”

But the woman says that response is less than satisfactory.

“I’m really disappointed in American Airlines for not taking ownership of their mistake or reprimanding the airline attendant for his rude behavior,” she told The Independent. “I feel insulted and the non-compliance statement is a complete and utter lie.”

Local Muslim couple removed from Delta flight: ‘It was humiliating’ [Cincinnati.com]
Two Muslim women who work for US government escorted off plane as they made staff ‘uncomfortable’ [The Independent]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Do You Have A Constitutional Right To Shop At Home Depot?

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

It’s not uncommon for a retailer to ban shoplifters from ever stepping foot on the premises again. However, a California man convicted of stealing from a Home Depot says that being barred from going back to the store — or any other Depot in the state — is a violation of his rights.

Back in Oct. 2012, the man was caught walking out of a San Jose, CA, Home Depot with $128 worth of purloined items stashed in his backpack. He eventually owned up to the theft and pleaded no contest to second degree burglary. As a condition of his probation, he agreed to not “go on the premises, parking lot adjacent or any store of Home Depot in the State of California.”

He subsequently appealed this order, arguing that there should be an exception “that would allow [him] to be on Home Depot property on legitimate business,” and that the probation condition violates his constitutional right to travel.

In 2013, a state court of appeal sided with the shoplifter [PDF], calling the probation condition “overbroad” and concluding that it would have been sufficient for the court to simply direct the man to not break the law again.

Prosecutors appealed that decision to the California Supreme Court, which issued an opinion [PDF] earlier this week rejecting the shoplifter’s argument and overturning the appeals court ruling.

Unlike freedoms of religion and speech, the “right to travel” is not explicitly spelled out in the Constitution or any of its amendments. However, in the 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Shapiro v. Thompson, the court noted that “the nature of our Federal Union and our constitutional concepts of personal liberty unite to require that all citizens be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement.”

And in 1995, the California Supreme Court ruling in Tobe v. City of Santa Ana clarified that the “right of intrastate travel has been recognized as a basic human right” protected by the state constitution.

However, in the Home Depot matter, California’s highest court found that the probation condition was nowhere near restrictive enough to be considered an unconstitutional prohibition on travel.

“Although criminal offenders placed on probation retain their constitutional right to travel, reasonable and incidental restrictions on their movement are permissible,” writes the court, pointing to examples like the man barred from going near his friend’s house after he was caught stealing $9,500 in jewelry from his pal’s bedroom. Similarly, the court had upheld a requirement that a juvenile former gang member in Orange County, CA, could not enter Los Angeles county — where his former gang was located — without being accompanied by a parent.

The Home Depot shoplifter argued that the probation condition barred him “from entering large areas of the state” and from “shopping or working in any store that shares a parking lot with a Home Depot.” That was not enough to convince the court.

“He remains free to drive on any public freeway, street or road, use public transportation, work (except in Home Depot stores), shop, visit the doctor’s office, attend school, enjoy parks, libraries, museums, restaurants, bars, clubs, and movie theaters,” writes the court. “He may — without violating the challenged condition — freely move about his community, the city, and the State of California.”

The court also rejected the argument that the parking lot prohibition went too far. While that restriction does expand the no-go zone for the shoplifter, “the overall limitation remains so minimal that the Home Depot stay-away condition does not implicate the concerns that underlie the constitutional right to travel.”

[via WSJ Law Blog]


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Walmart Customers Report Barrage Of Password Reset Requests

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Getting an email from a retailer telling you to reset your password because you may have been the victim of a data breach is alarming enough. Imagine you’re one of the Walmart.com shoppers who say they have received <i>dozens</i> of emails directing them to reset their login credentials.

BGR reports that Walmart.com customers began sharing news of the emails on social media on Thursday.

While Walmart has yet to confirm that it is the latest victim of a hack attack or that it is aware of the potential phishing attempt, the customers concerned that the emails are a phishing attempt say they appear to be from a legitimate Walmart.com address.

Unlike traditional phishing scams, the emails don’t take users to an external link to reset their password, but instead mimic the email one would receive when they simply forgot their password.

“Please enter the following verification code on our website, and you’ll be able to rest your password.

If you didn’t request a password change, please visit out Help Center. Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is unmonitored.”

It’s unclear how a scam would work using this type of email, BGR reports, but it appears the number of times someone can request a reset password is unlimited.

One user posted on Twitter that he had received more than 1,000 reset emails from Walmart.com.

We reached out to Walmart about the possible issue. We’ll update this post when we hear back.

In the meantime, it the retailer has responded to some Twitter users expressing concerns about the emails, warning that they should not click on any link in emails.

Someone is trying to steal accounts from Walmart.com customers [BGR]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Here We Go Again: Even More Pumpkin Spice Breakfast Foods

http://ift.tt/1TjAoJq

It’s August, and we all know what that means: it’s time for the hot new pumpkin spice products for this fall to hit the aisles and confuse everyone. This year’s hot newcomers are pumpkin spice offerings from cereal companies, with the apparent goal of pumpkin spicing up America’s breakfast tables.

pumpkin_spice_cheeriosSales of cereal are falling in general, due to changes in our breakfast habits and sugar and carbohydrates falling out of favor. That means cereal-makers are happy to seize any gimmick they can to move some boxes.

We’ve already shared the news that General Mills had pumpkin spice Cheerios planned, and those are finally hitting stores this month. Farther down the cereal aisle, pumpkin spice fans will be able to find pumpkin spice specialties from Kellogg’s, including returning cereal pumpkin spice Frosted Mini-Wheats, and a newcomer in pumpkin spice Special K.

specialKnutrigrain

Some cereal-adjacent breakfast items will be pumpkin pie flavored Pop-Tarts, which are returning from last year, and newcomer pumpkin spice Nutri-Grain bars. (If they’re as good as the Trader Joe’s version from last year, those might be worth buying.)

Also ready for your breakfast table will be pumpkin spice flavored English muffins and bagels from Thomas, which will probably be really great with pumpkin spice hummus spread on them.


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Probably Avoid These Skin Care Products If You Don’t Want Mercury Poisoning

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Mercury poisoning doesn’t sound fun, but it also doesn’t necessarily sound like something the average consumer runs into a lot in modern cosmetic aisles, what with federal regulations banning dangerous levels of the stuff. However, there are a slew of illegal skin care products for sale out there that contain mercury, and the Food and Drug Administration doesn’t want folks slathering them on their bodies.

The FDA says many cosmetics marketed as “anti-aging” or “skin-lightening” contain mercury, and are usually marketed as treatments that remove age spots, freckles, blemishes, and wrinkles. Young people may also use them as acne treatments.

So how will you know if there’s mercury? Check the label, the FDA says: if the words “mercurous chloride,” “calomel,” “mercuric,” “mercurio,” or “mercury” are listed, mercury’s in it and you should stop using the product immediately.

What if there are no ingredients listed? Don’t assume it’s fine, the FDA warns.

“Federal law requires that ingredients be listed on the label of any cosmetic or nonprescription drug, so do not use a product that doesn’t have a label,” the agency advises. “In addition, don’t use drugs or cosmetics labeled in languages other than English unless English labeling is also provided. That’s also a sign that the product may be marketed illegally.”

These kinds of products are usually manufactured abroad and then sold illegally stateside, Jason Humbert of FDA’s Office of Regulatory Affairs explains, often in stores that cater to the Latino, Asian, African, or Middle Eastern communities. They’re also promoted online on social media sold through mobile apps, and some people may bring them back from other countries for personal use as well.

“Even though these products are often promoted as cosmetics, they also may be unapproved new drugs under the law,” says Linda Katz, M.D., director of FDA’s Office of Cosmetics and Colors.

According to the FDA, mercury compounds are easily absorbed through the skin, and tend to accumulate in the body. They may cause allergic reactions, skin irritation, or neurotoxic problems.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Here’s What You Should And Shouldn’t Bother To Buy For College

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

It’s back-to-school season, when stores stack their aisles high with folding chairs and mini-fridges meant for students heading to college or back to college. What do you actually need, though, and how should you shop for it? What should you spend a lot on, and what can you leave behind? Our colleagues down the hall at Consumer Reports have some ideas about what new students should shop for, and how to shop for it.

For some items, it’s best to learn how things work with your schedule, then head to the store later if you turn out to need it. Some dorms are dry and really could use a humidifier; some have sealed windows and your big fan designed for a window sill will be useless. Leave things behind and fetch them at October break if possible. Still, here are some basics to remember and how to shop for them.

Fridge and microwave. Your college may rent micro-fridges, which feature a microwave and a mini-fridge, and most importantly don’t have to be hauled home with you in the summer. You may find this useful even if there is a communal lounge fridge and microwave.

Sheets. Look for 100% cotton, and check with the college to see whether the beds are standard length or Twin XL. Classic cotton wears better than microfiber or jersey, and you probably don’t need a second set of sheets depending on the laundry access situation.

Iron. Yeah, you’re not going to iron anything.

What to Buy for a College Dorm and What to Skip [Consumer Reports]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Mercedes-Benz Reportedly Working On Line Of Electric Vehicles To Take On Tesla

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Things are about to be a bit more electric over at Mercedes-Benz: the carmaker is reportedly set to intensify its work on alternative-fuel cars with the introduction of four new models.

Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter, reports that Mercedes will build its own distinct line of electric vehicles starting with two SUVs and two sedans.

The new cars will be sold under a new sub-brand that has yet to be created, the sources say, noting that the plan falls in line with CEO Dieter Zetsche’s June announcement that the company would unveil an electric car at the Paris motor show this fall.

That vehicle is expected to be an SUV capable of driving about 300 miles on a single charge, Bloomberg reports.

The line of electric vehicles isn’t exactly a new endeavor for Mercedes, the carmaker has previously dabbled in the area, adding electric motors to existing models.

The new vehicles are expected to be offered for sale by the end of the decade, the sources say.

Mercedes Is About to Unveil an Entire Fleet of Electric Vehicles [Bloomberg]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Some Jerks Are Using Bluetooth Card Skimming Devices At Dallas Gas Stations

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

If you live in the Dallas area, you might want to rethink using plastic to pay at the gas station. Not because debit and credit cards aren’t a fine way to pay for fuel, but because some jerks are using Bluetooth skimming devices to steal from oblivious drivers at the pump.

Dallas police say they’ve recently discovered five different skimming devices that use Bluetooth, CBS Dallas-Fort Worth (warning: link contains video that autoplays) reports, buried inside payment card kiosks at four different ExxonMobile gas stations.

The devices mean that criminals never have to come back to the machine to collect the data they reap — all that card data gets sent through the air to someone sitting nearby on their computer.

“They can do it in a split second, put it on. So they obviously have knowledge of the pumps,” a Dallas Police lieutenant told the station.

This isn’t the first we’ve heard of some jackanapes employing Bluetooth to steal money at gas stations: we first learned about the issue back in 2014, when it was becoming popular in the southern U.S.

So how can you fight back? Pay with cash. Or if you really want to use plastic, keep an eye out for security tape stickers that have been tampered with, which could mean someone was messing with the kiosk.

Crooks Using Bluetooth To Steal At Gas Pumps [CBS DFW]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Wendy’s Quietly Getting Rid Of Antibiotics In Chicken

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

The same week that McDonald’s publicly touted that its chicken menu items are now 100% free of antibiotics, Wendy’s quietly changed its policies to establish a timeline for ridding its birds of antibiotics that are deemed medically important to humans.

Unless you’re a regular reader of Wendy’s Antibiotic Use And Policy Guidelines, you probably missed a recent update where the fast food chain confirmed that its goal is to eliminate “all antibiotics important to human medicine from chicken production” in 2017.

Wendy’s began testing antibiotic-free chicken a year ago, but its lack of a timeline or firm policy for reducing the use of these drugs meant the company was one of more than a dozen fast food chains receiving a grade of “F” on the Natural Resources Defense Council’s antibiotics policy report card.

The company tells Reuters that around half of its chicken are now drug-free, and that it should complete the transition in the coming year.

What remains to be seen is what Wendy’s and others will do about the use of antibiotics in beef and pork. Chickens can grow to full size within a couple of months, but it takes a lot longer for pigs and cattle to reach that point. These larger animals are also sometimes passed from one owner to another during their lifetime. Thus, making the switch to antibiotic-free beef will likely take longer than it has for poultry.

That said, Wendy’s claims that it is studying how to reduce antibiotic use in both beef and pork and that in 2017 it will commit to specific reduction goals.

Antibiotics sold to farm animals account for around 75% of all antibiotics sold in the U.S., and many of these drugs are not medically necessary. Instead, they are put in animal feed and water at sub-therapeutic levels because their use can promote growth, resulting in bigger chickens, cows, and pigs.

At the same time, overuse of antibiotics has been linked to the increasing number of drug-resistant superbugs. More than 2 million Americans are infected with resistant pathogens each year, and around 20-25% of those are from food-borne bacteria.

Facing stricter regulations on the use of antibiotics in livestock, and a growing demand from consumers for drug-free meat, Bloomberg reports that the pharmaceuticals industry is looking to pivot farmers and ranchers away from some antibiotics and toward vaccines.


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Crackdown Coming For Stealth Social Media Ads

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

We’ve seen Warner Bros. get in trouble for paying YouTubers to hype a new game without properly revealing they were paid, and we’ve seen Lord & Taylor caught paying Instagram influencers to shill for a new dress. Yet our social media feeds are still overflowing with celebrities and semi-celebrities pushing products without disclosing that they are receiving a paycheck to do so.

The Federal Trade Commission says it will put more pressure on advertisers to make sure they comply with regulations related to disclosures of paid media content, Bloomberg reports.

“We’ve been interested in deceptive endorsements for decades and this is a new way in which they are appearing,” Michael Ostheimer, a deputy in the FTC’s Ad Practices Division, said. “We believe consumers put stock in endorsements and we want to make sure they are not being deceived.”

In many cases, celebrities and internet stars who are paid for their endorsements of products on social media use hashtags, such as #ad, #sponsored, or #sp.

While these posters might believe these designations are enough, the FTC says it has quickly found that isn’t always the case.

According to Ostheimer, the hashtags are often missed by viewers, or they tend to be mixed in with other tags the poster has used.

“If consumers don’t read the words, then there is no effective disclosure,” Ostheimer tells Bloomberg. “If you have seven other hashtags at the end of a Tweet and it’s mixed up with all these other things, it’s easy for consumers to skip over that. The real test is, did consumers read it and comprehend it?”

To alleviate confusion over the sponsored content, the FTC suggests that any disclosures be made at the beginning of a message. When it comes to video posts, the agency believes disclosure should be said aloud or displayed on the video itself.

Some advertisers argue that this is much ado about nothing because the celebrities being paid to shill for these products are genuinely fans. But that doesn’t matter; if you’re getting paid to say you like something, you have to disclose that fact.

Additionally, a few high-profile gaffes have shown that some internet personalities are letting their sponsors put words in their mouths.

 

For example, while we don’t know if reality TV personality Scott Disick likes or uses Skinny Tea’s protein shakes, or if Naomi Campbell likes Adidas shoes, both celebrities failed miserably recently when posting about the products on Instagram.

Instead of sharing their personal thoughts on the products, they simply pasted copy — and instructions — provided by the marketing teams on their social media pages.

While missteps like these make it explicitly clear that the person was paid for the post, some advertisers say providing copy for the celebrity makes the post seem less authentic, reducing their impact, Bloomberg Reports.

 

FTC to Crack Down on Paid Celebrity Posts That Aren’t Clear Ads [Bloomberg]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Uber Passenger Claims Driver Attacked Her After Dropping Her Off

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

A Los Angeles woman says she doesn’t feel safe alone with Uber drivers at night, after a driver allegedly attacked her after taking her to her destination.

The woman says she hailed an Uber to take her from the Redondo Beach Pier to her parked car, reports CBS Los Angeles (warning: link contains video that autoplays). But when she got out of the vehicle, she said followed her.

“He lunged at me, grabbed me, started smashing his face, his mouth onto my mouth and shoving his tongue into my mouth. And I shoved him off me and I’m shouting, ‘No! No,’ ” she said, adding that he did that twice before he let her go.

She says she reported it to both Uber and police, both of which say they’re investigating.

“The behavior described is disturbing and is not tolerated,” Uber said in a statement. “The driver has been banned from the platform, and we will work with law enforcement to support their investigation.”

CBS L.A. pointed to another alleged assault, with a woman Tweeting to Uber that a driver “just assaulted me and threw me in the side of the highway. Please respond.”

While Uber Support replied that it was looking into it, the company told CBS it hasn’t talked to the customer directly yet.

The first woman says she now plans to take a taxi in the future.

“I used to think that Uber was safe, and I do not feel that it is safe at all,” she said.

Uber has come under fire in the past for not doing enough to safeguard its customers in these kinds of situations, by implementing more thorough vetting methods. But when cities like Austin and Chicago tried to get Uber and its rival Lyft to require drivers’ fingerprints, well, it didn’t go so well: the ride-hailing companies suspended service in Austin in May over the issue, and Chicago backed off from its plan to require fingerprints (at least for now) to keep the services operating in the city.

‘I Don’t Feel Safe Anymore’: Woman Claims Uber Driver Lunged At Her, Shoved Tongue In Mouth [CBS L.A.]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Racketeering Charges In Luxury Brands’ Lawsuit Against Alibaba Dismissed

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

While a lawsuit filed against e-commerce platform Alibaba and 14 of its sellers by French luxury goods maker Kering continues, a federal judge has dismissed part of it. The judge has ruled that the parent company of Balenciaga, Gucci, Puma, and Saint Laurent failed to prove that Alibaba and its vendors worked together in an enterprise to sell knockoff designer goods at at super cheap prices. However, the allegations that the site allowed knockoff items to proliferate remain.

While the merchants may have been aware that others existed, Kering’s lawyers failed to prove that the platform and vendors, or even just all the vendors, were working together to rip off Kering’s brands.

“The fraud perpetrated by each merchant defendant could be accomplished without any assistance from any other merchant defendant,” Judge Kevin Castel wrote.

Alibaba continues to fight allegations that it’s a place where counterfeiters can easily set up shop and sell items for maybe 1% of the retail price of an original item, with handbags being a commonly copied item.

Companies refused to accept Alibaba as a member of an industry anti-counterfeiting coalition, even as the company claims to scan the site with the help of brand partners anad respond correctly to their requests to remove an item and ban the seller.

U.S. judge dismisses part of Alibaba counterfeit goods lawsuit [Reuters]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

It Takes Dozens Of Companies To Make Your iPhone

http://ift.tt/2b86Iix

Where does your mobile phone actually come from? What company makes it? How many people — how many businesses, how many factories, how many hands — were involved in its making? Most of us probably have no idea whatsoever how to answer those questions.

A smartphone comes from Apple or Samsung, sure, from the Verizon store or Best Buy or a website. It comes from China, maybe? Or some other nation that does a lot of manufacturing. It comes in a box and it works, right? That’s all most of us really think about, on any given day.

But the iPhone in your hand is not only a marvel of modern coding… it’s a miracle of modern logistics. Its supply chain is sprawling, and hard to track. Minerals come from some suppliers. Manufacturing, from others. Each screw, lens, solder, chip, and piece of glass has to be designed, manufactured, shipped, and assembled — before we get anywhere close to the 1.4 million people in the U.S. alone that Apple claims make their living from the “app economy.”

The process is pretty opaque. We all know that the phones aren’t simply wished into being by magical elves, but the reality of how they are made is hard to understand — even after years of efforts to increase transparency.

We’re not here to pick on Apple, just to be clear. In fact, Apple is more transparent about their suppliers and process than most of the competition, which is how we can even write this story: The company publishes a list of its 200 largest suppliers every year (PDF) as part of a corporate responsibility initiative, and says that list of suppliers accounts for 97% of its spending.

So, when you look at that list of suppliers, what do you actually find?

Global Means Global

Without even counting where the minerals are mined, where the phones are used, and the shipping logistics of making it all happen… Apple’s supply chain really is global.

The company’s top-200 list of supply partners includes 753 listed office and manufacturing facility locations worldwide. As you’d likely guess, the majority of those addresses are in China, Japan, and the United States. But other nations, large and small, appear. The full list of of countries involves every continent except Australia and Antarctica, including:

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • China
  • Czech Republic
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Malaysia
  • Malta
  • Mexico
  • Morocco
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • South Korea
  • Taiwan
  • Thailand
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Vietnam

Components are manufactured worldwide, but most of the final assembly is done at factories owned by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. in Zhengzhou, China. Americans usually recognize that company by its other name, Foxconn Technology Group. The company, which also assembles gaming consoles, other smartphones, and a huge number of other electronics, has an estimated 1.3 million employees in dozens of facilities worldwide.

Some Names You Know

While many of the companies Apple does big business with are completely unknown in the U.S., plenty are major global players in their own right. A sample:

Samsung
One of Apple’s biggest, most important suppliers? A company best thought of as competition in the global smartphone market.

Samsung, a South Korean company with roughly 490,000 employees, makes the actual processor chip that makes your phone — a pocket computer — work. And they make it in… Austin, Texas.

The company makes about 75% of the A9 chips included in the Apple iPhone 6S and 6S plus. Samsung also reportedly manufactured a minority of the A8 chips in the iPhone 6, as well as the A7 (iPhone 5S, several iPads), the A6 (iPhone 5 and 5C), and in fact the processor chips for all iPhones models prior.

So yes: the virtual “brain” that makes your iPhone function is brought to you by the company best known for dominating the high-end Android market.

3M
Home consumers know 3M best for their sticky products: Scotch Tape and Post-It Notes. But they also design and make a whole lot of electronics components. And sure, there are a whole lot of fancy adhesives on that list, because of course there are… but the most important part, for an iPhone, is something called a touch sensor film.

What separates an ordinary glass display screen from a functioning smartphone? Its capacity to respond to a touch interface.

Without that film, there’s no pinch, zoom, or tap. 3M has been supplying touch films to Apple for years and regularly announces some new, upgraded, better version every year or two.

Corning
Your first exposure to Corning, if you’re like many Americans, was a casserole dish on Grandma’s Thanksgiving table. The company sells ridiculous amounts of bakeware and home-user kitchenware under the Corning, Corelle, and Pyrex brands (among others).

But it also, famously, makes Gorilla Glass, a strengthened, toughened, durable glass that does not easily scratch or break and can survive living in your pocket or handbag for a year.

The product is used in basically every smartphone you can think of, including all Apple iPhones. In recent years Apple had been researching alternatives, but those plans didn’t work out and so your iPhone’s still using Gorilla Glass.

Corning just recently announced its newest Gorilla Glass version (5), and will likely to continue to appear in your iPhone for some time to come.

Texas Instruments
Texas Instruments has, of course, always been far more than the company that made your high-school graphing calculator… even if the TI-82 (or its younger siblings) is what most of us immediately envision on reading the name.

The company, which employs 31,000 people in 35 countries, does indeed still have its headquarters in, yes, Texas. It is one of the many in the world that make the processors that drive basically all modern electronic goods. Selling those embedded processors and analog chips to the companies that put them into other products account for about 85% of TI’s revenue.

In the iPhone specifically, TI provides chips that help make sure that when you touch the screen, the insides of the phones can process that into the input signal it is. In other words: something pretty dang important to the basic function of the phone.

TI isn’t the only company that has touch screen controllers in the iPhone; another company, Broadcom, has one in there too. It takes a lot of parts to make the iPhone go.

And Names You Don’t

Dozens of the companies on Apple’s supplier list are almost completely unknown to anyone who doesn’t actually make electronics for a living… even when they’re hugely important. Once again, just a small sample:

Largan Precision
This Taiwanese company has, in a sense, made this entire decade — the entire way we use the internet and communicate with each other — possible. Why?

Because they make the camera lenses that you find in almost every iPhone, and most Samsung Android phones too.

That’s it. That’s what they contribute to the iPhone: camera lenses. The lenses are assembled into the camera module elsewhere, and those modules are then later assembled into the phone itself. But without those lenses, there would be no video chat, no recordings of protests, no Facebook livestreaming from your pocket, no “pics or it didn’t happen.”

The company is expected to continue making lenses for the upcoming iPhone 7 at least, if not also later generations.

Cirrus Logic
This company, which is based in Austin, TX, employs 1100 workers in its 15 locations worldwide. And while it makes some industrial parts, the big thing Cirrus is known for is audio.

Your phone is, after all, a phone. You need to be able to hear what comes through it. Likewise, it is also your modern iPod, Spotify streaming device, and TV-watching tool — all of which require functional audio.

And that’s where Cirrus, and its array of converters, amplifiers, and codecs come in. Those are all the parts that take audio signals — from voice to music — and let them be read into sound for your ears to hear.

Cirrus does not by any stretch only make these chips for mobile devices; you’ll find them inside a wide ray of other audio devices (including on some PC sound cards), too.

Apple is, however, Cirrus’s largest customer… which is why investors and crystal-ball readers look at what Cirrus is up to to prognosticate about future Apple products and stock. (Like those increasingly-plausible rumors that the iPhone 7 will kill the common headphone jack.)

Murata Manufacturing
Murata is a 65-year-old Japanese company that makes almost nothing you’ve ever heard of. Their corporate website touts products from “monolithic ceramic capacitors” to “multilayer ceramic devices” and the happily vague “sensors.”

Those tiny parts pack a big punch, though. Although it does make bluetooth connectors and parts that let your phone have a vibrate setting, Murata’s most important product is a line of ceramic capacitors, minuscule parts that regulate where and how electricity moves inside your phone. No electricity, no phone!

As of 2014, Murata commanded half the international smartphone market for the parts it supplies, and in turn those parts comprised a solid 40% of its overall sales.

It seems to be working: right now, Murata’s valued at about $28 billion, and has been on a generally upward trajectory for years.

Vishay Intertechnology
Vishay is actually an American company with its headquarters in Pennsylvania, although it has manufacturing facilities and offices worldwide. (Apple has 19 Vishay locations on its supplier list.) You can be forgiven for never having heard of it anyway, though, unless you work in electrical engineering.

Vishay makes the sort of parts that make a lot of sense to the folks who design and make electronics like smartphones, but that make almost anyone else’s eyes glaze over in confusion.

The company makes different kinds of semiconductors, which at their most basic are the silicon bits that make computer chips work. It also makes passive components, including resistors and capacitors, that help manage and direct the flow of current inside your phone. In other words: the bits that let the signal go from point A to point B, without letting too much signal go from point A to point B.

Exponential Growth

Once you get past the conveniently-alphebatized list that Apple says accounts for 97% of its expenditures, things start to get really murky.

As we know, Apple has roughly 200 suppliers. Let’s then imagine, for the sake of argument, that each of them has just five. That’s already a total of 1,200 businesses involved. Now let’s say each of those suppliers, in turn, has only three. Only two tiers in, we’re up to 4,200 imaginary companies to keep track of.

That’s just a thought exercise, of course. The actual number could easily be at least an order of magnitude larger, if not far more. Or perhaps, theoretically, smaller, if many companies in that second tier out are actually sourcing their parts and materials from the same suppliers.

But investigating that, and coming to actual numbers, is extraordinarily challenging. Not all companies publish a public supplier list. Most don’t, in fact. And even when they do, there may be strategically missing information.

Because it’s worth noting that although it does publish that comprehensive supplier list, Apple remains incredibly tight-lipped about who makes its parts — to the point where those suppliers are often not allowed publicly to say who they supply.

Apple, for example, is nowhere on Corning’s list of products that use Gorilla Glass. Likewise, Cirrus, also on Apple’s supplier list, is “widely understood,” but not explicitly stated, to have Apple as its largest client. Everything exists in a layer of open secrets and hush-hush need-to-know information — which might be good for those who play the stock market, but doesn’t do much for anyone else.

So why does it matter?

First, because it’s important to realize how complicated the modern global economy is. A butterfly flapping its wings in China might not create a literal hurricane, but it can create a disruption that creates another disruption that slows a train that shifts a contract that alters a supply chain that moves a shipment that puts manufacturing in another country that changes a local economy that, well, you get the idea.

And second: because increasingly, consumers are holding giant corporations responsible for their impact on human rights and the environment. And with a corporation the size of Apple, those effects are profound.

The same problems exist in basically every industry. Clothing retailer Patagonia, for example, has been trying hard for years to excise all exploited labor from their supply chain and make it fully sustainable. It’s a core element of their brand and their consumer appeal — and yet they still can’t make a universal guarantee. Their suppliers are good, but their suppliers’ suppliers’ suppliers’ and subcontractors around the world are all but impossible to reach, track or audit.

Electronics sourcing is particularly fraught. The delicate components that smartphones need in order to work require elements and minerals — cobalt, tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold, among others — that are primarily found and extracted in developing, conflict-heavy nations like the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

U.S. law requires publicly owned companies to disclose any use of conflict minerals. (Not to avoid them; just to disclose them.) But to be able to know and accurately disclose that, you have to be able to audit your suppliers. And there’s only so far down the chain most companies can go.

In addition to auditing their own direct suppliers (all 200+ of them), Apple has also explicitly tried to audit for and eliminate suppliers of conflict minerals from the next rung of its supply chain, by going to the smelters. But even then, as experts told Newsweek in 2015: “When you think about the context of these mines being primarily artisanal, very informal, there is no paperwork, so what evidence do any of the audits have to rely on? At the end of the day, we don’t really know what the reality is.”

As for tracking whether or not exploitative child labor is being used in those “artisanal” mines, that’s even harder. Earlier this year Amnesty International released a report showing how hard it is to trace just one component — cobalt — from just one supplier to the companies that end up using it in the end:

From a 2016 report by Amnesty International.

by Kate Cox via Consumerist

Comcast Decides To Not Charge Early Termination Fees To Flood-Ravaged Stores

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Flood waters recently tore through Ellicott City, MD, forcing some businesses to close up shop. One store says Comcast tried to rub salt in this fresh wound by demanding it pay hundreds of dollars to cancel service it can no longer use.

“Comcast is unbelievable,” wrote the Park Ridge Trading Co. yesterday. “They are charging the destroyed businesses an ‘early termination’ fee (about $600), and are insisting on charging for this past week although no services are being provided.”

The store says Comcast was also requiring that affected businesses sign a written agreement that they would pay the fee before the cable giant would turn off service — even though the storm waters had effectively done that job days earlier.

“There should be a special place in hell for business owners who try to capitalize on the misery of others,” wrote Park Ridge.

After this story began to catch fire on social media yesterday, Comcast told Baltimore’s Fox 45 that it had a change of heart.

“Given the circumstances, we will be waiving the early termination fee and will also ensure that billing is stopped for as long as they don’t have service,” writes Comcast. “We’ve reached out to the customer to apologize and are working to make this right.”

Park Ridge Trading confirmed this early Friday morning in a Facebook update, saying that “executives at Comcast contacted us to apologize and have promised to remedy the situation for all of the affected businesses and residents.”

This is not the first time Comcast has been chastised for treating customers poorly in the wake of a natural disaster. There was the time it decided that a Michigan customer who had lost their home to a tornado was “on vacation.” And we couldn’t forget when Comcast demanded the return of a cable box from a home hit by Hurricane Sandy, even though the property was at risk for fire or explosion because of a gas leak.


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Apple Launches Bug Bounty Program; Will Pay Up To $200K For Reports

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Between iPhones, iPads, Mac computers, and other devices, hundreds of millions of people have sensitive personal information stored on Apple products. In an effort to ensure this info and other data remains secure, Apple has joined the ranks of companies publicly offering bug bounties to hackers who find and alert Apple of security flaws.

Apple unveiled the bug bounty program at the Black Hat security conference on Thursday, saying it will begin offering cash bounties of up to $200,000 to researchers who discover vulnerabilities in its products, Apple Insider reports.

The program, which will officially launch in September, will initially be invitation-only. Exactly who will receive these invitations was unclear, but the company says that non-members who find particularly interesting bugs and report them could find an invitation waiting.

For now, Apple Insider reports the payouts for security issues are relegated to five categories of risk:

• $200,000 for secure boot firmware components
• $100,000 for extraction of confidential material protected by the Secure Enclave Processor
• $50,000 for execution of arbitrary code with kernel privileges
• $50,000 for unauthorized access to iCloud account data on Apple servers
• $25,000 for access from a sandboxed process to user data outside of that sandbox

Apple Insider reports that it appears Apple will expand the risk categories in the future, but the company didn’t say when.

To be eligible for a reward, researchers must provide a proof-of-concept on the latest iOS and hardware.

TechCrunch reports that Apple will determine the exact reward amount based on the clarity of the vulnerability report; the novelty of the problem and the likelihood of user exposure; and the degree of user interaction necessary to exploit the vulnerability.

Researchers who choose not to take a payout, but instead donate it to charity, will see their payment matched one-for-one by Apple.

Apple announces upcoming bug bounty program, initially invite-only [Apple Insider]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Amazon Showing Off Its First Branded Freight Plane

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

It’s not enough for Amazon to sell folks anything from tablets to kitty litter, streaming video to bendy straws — it wants to be in control of its own shipping, too. To show off what the latest step in that plan looks like, Amazon is unveiling its first freight plane, emblazoned with the company logo on the side so no one can mistake who’s in charge.

Amazon announced earlier this year that it’d be leasing a fleet of 40 planes from two different aircraft leasing companies, Atlas Air, and Air Transport Service Group, and now everyone knows what they’ll look like: the company unveiled its “Prime Air” branded Boeing 767 that’s been converted into a freighter by Atlas. It’s called “Amazon One,” and bears the number N1997A on its tail — the year the company went public, and a prime number for its Prime customers.

With these planes, Amazon will have enough shipping capacity during the busy times like the holidays, and flexibility at other times, Amazon’s senior vice president of operations Dave Clark told Recode in an interview.

“You can almost think about the difference between commercial flight and private flight,” Clark said. “We have the ability, with our own planes, to create connections between one point and another point that are exactly tailored to our needs, and exactly tailored to the timing of when we want to put packages on those routes — versus other peoples’ networks which are optimized to run their entire network. We add capacity, we add flexibility and it gives us cost-control capability as well.”

Though there’s been some talk that maybe Amazon’s big push into the air cargo business could mean it wants to take on FedEx and USPS and ship packages for other companies, Clark says that’s not the case… at least, at the moment.

“Right now, everything going on those planes is inventory held in Amazon fulfillment centers and sold on the Amazon website,” he told the Seattle Times. “And we have more than enough package supply to utilize the 40 planes we’ve procured.”

Prime One will take to the skies over Seattle today during the city’s annual Seafair Air Show today to show off the new branding, but there are a total of 11 dedicated Amazon planes flying for the company as of today, with more planes rolling out over time.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Consumerist Friday Flickr Finds

http://ift.tt/2aJGiTB

Here are seven of the best photos that readers added to the Consumerist Flickr Pool in the last week, picked for usability in a Consumerist post or for just plain neatness.

Santos Gonzalez
Joel Zimmer
Karen Chappell
Sharese Ann Frederick
Xavier J. Peg
Debbie Mercer

Want to see your pictures on our site? Our Flickr pool is the place where Consumerist readers upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click “Join Group?” up on the top right. Choose your best photos, then click “send to group” on the individual images you want to add to the pool.


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Michaels Buys Mailing Lists, Intellectual Property Of Hancock Fabrics

http://ift.tt/2b6DHnp

When the original intellectual property auction for the remaining assets of the former sewing and craft chain Hancock Fabrics concluded, the winning bidder was a company called ADMACO, Inc. Who? That turned out to be an alias for Michaels, the nationwide craft supplies chain, which will take over the Hancock Fabrics trademarks, and the 10 million names on its mailing list.

The serious crafters in the audience are probably asking themselves, “Wait, what would Michaels want with a serious sewing and fabric store like Hancock? They barely even sell sewing supplies!”

That’s true, though Michaels does have a wide selection of fabrics and sewing machines available to buy online. Maybe they think that Hancock’s customers are interested in scrapbooking supplies, beads, and Rainbow Loom, too.

hancockcontacts

The good news, according to the report of the privacy ombudsman [PDF] in this bankruptcy, is that Michaels will allow people on the Hancock Fabrics list to opt in, and has agreed to abide by the privacy policy of Hancock Fabrics. There will be opportunities by e-mail and on the Hancock Fabrics and Michaels websites to opt out if you don’t want Michaels to contact you.

Here are some of the brands that Michaels is getting, if it does decide to expand its offerings in fabric, notions, and sewing machines:

trademarks

The sale also includes a long list of domain names, which include the baffling SnuggieOutlet.com, which isn’t an active site right now.

(Via Chain Store Age)


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Hampton Creek Sent Out Undercover Shoppers To Buy Up Its Mayo, Ask Stores About It

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Corporate drama and intrigue are not things that one normally associates with the condiment aisle at the grocery store, but that’s what has been happening since Hampton Creek’s eggless product Just Mayo hit the market back in 2014. Now there’s a new accusation against the company: that it dispatched undercover agents to retail stores to buy up mayonnaise and ask stores to carry it, increasing sales and buzz.

The problems began with a lawsuit from leading brand Hellmann’s, then a dispute with the Food and Drug Administration, and finally the exposure of a plot against the brand that went all the way to the head of the National Egg Council. This new problem doesn’t involve Big Egg or the government trying to stop the company, though.

Bloomberg obtained documents exposing the practice and spoke to some former contractors who worked across the country, who the company called “Creekers.” Expense reports show that the company had sent Creekers out to different stores as they picked up Hampton Creek products. Shoppers were sent out to Safeway, Kroger, Costco, Walmart, Target, and Whole Foods stores all over the country and reimbursed for their Just Mayo purchases.

The company’s CEO explained to Bloomberg that this is not as scammy as it sounds, really. The jars customers were buying were quality-control samples, and the company wanted to ensure that the product survived its trip from the factory to the stores successfully.

Most food producers would point out that’s what checking products before they leave the factory is for, but CEO Josh Tetrick says that checking products as they reach the store shelves gives a better picture of what customers are really getting.

“Assessing the product from the customer perspective, more than anything, gets us out of the bubble of typical manufacturing,” he explained to Bloomberg in an e-mail. “This was and always will be the primary purpose of it, which is why we’ll continue doing it.”

Sending shoppers out to buy things and check displays is a time-honored business practice. Our own sibling publication, Consumer Reports, does exactly this, hiring mystery shoppers across the country to buy products from ordinary stores, shipping them to the magazine’s offices to be tested.

What doesn’t seem quite right about the Hampton Creek efforts, though, is the amount of product that the shoppers bought, and the language in memos that they received.

“The most important next step with Safeway is huge sales out of the gate,” the company’s director of corporate partnerships wrote to contractors across the country in the spring of 2014. “This will ensure we stay on the shelf to put an end to Hellmann’s factory-farmed egg mayo, and spread the word to customers that Just Mayo is their new preferred brand. :)”

Executives insist that the purchases were all for quality control projects, but former contractors and employees told Bloomberg Businessweek that the projects were separate. The unconventional quality control checks and just buying up jars of mayo weren’t the same thing. Shoppers were told that they could use or get rid of the mayo they received as they saw fit.

“There’s no legitimate explanation for a manufacturer buying significant quantities of their own product from the shelf,” a business analytics expert told Bloomberg.

Creekers began as in-store brand representatives who would hand out samples and talk up the brand, but their jobs changed in 2014, to the “undercover project” of buying up mayo. Some former contractors have evidence of buying hundreds of jars every week.

(Also, Bloomberg created a profoundly disturbing illustration for this story that we can’t stop watching. Check it out.)

Hampton Creek Ran Undercover Project to Buy Up Its Own Vegan Mayo [Bloomberg Technology]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Apple Music’s Real Android App Is Ready

http://ift.tt/2aWxsXh

Last November, Apple fulfilled its promise to bring its subscription music service to Android users. Only, that app was simply a beta of Apple Music. Today, the company unveiled its real app. 

Apple unveiled the fully fledged Apple Music app on Google Play Thursday, CNET reports, noting that the previous version available on the store was a test edition.

The app, which officially received a 1.0 version, has much of the same features that the beta and iOS version include: the ability to stream more than 30 million songs, access to on-demand curated radio stations, and listen to playlists created by music experts.

Apple also included an equalizer settings to allow users to adjust the bass and other levels as well as choose certain preset music types.

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 2.59.18 PM

The launch of an official version of the app could be one way for Apple to bring up its ratings for the in the Google Play store. The app currently has a rating of 3.3, with users complaining about several bugs: music not playing, downloaded songs removed, and unexpected crashes.

Apple Music’s Android app officially ready to rock [CNET]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Grassfields Farms Cheese Sold At Whole Foods Recalled For Possible E. Coli

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Cheese is one of our favorite foods here at Consumerist, but its creamy deliciousness doesn’t make it immune to some very unappetizing foodborne pathogens. Grassfields Cheese, a small producer in Michigan, has announced a recall of all cheeses produced between December 2015 and August 2016 because they have been linked to E. coli infections.

The products were linked to cases of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, a foodborne illness that at best causes abdominal cramping, diarrhea (often bloody, which is scary) and vomiting. A serious complication of E. coli is hemolytic uremic syndrome, which affects the blood and kidneys, and often happens in infected children, elderly people, or people with compromised immune systems. Investigators discovered the potential contamination while tracing the cause of seven cases of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli.

The company sells its own cheese locally and online, but Whole Foods also carries it in certain states. Shoppers in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Wisconsin may have purchased the cheese in their local stores, though not all Whole Foods locations carry it.

The affected flavors of Grassfields cheeses were Gouda, Onion ‘n Garlic, Country Dill, Leyden, Edam, Lamont Cheddar, Fait Gras, and Polkton Corners. The FDA didn’t make packaging photos available, but the cheeses came in clear plastic wrap, with PLU codes from 206151 to 0206159 inclusive, and sell by dates up through 9/2/16.

Grassfields Cheese Recall Affects Select Whole Foods Market Locations; Grocer Recalls Product from Cheese Departments [FDA]
Grassfields Cheese [Facebook]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist