Menu

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Laundry, Newspapers, And Kink: Terrible Mother’s Day Gift Ideas

http://ift.tt/1zxmFIU

Earlier this week, we asked you to send along poorly-thought-out ideas that marketers have presented as great ideas for Mother’s Day gifts. Americans plan to spend a little more on their moms this year, and marketers want a part of it.

Here’s the image that kicked this post off: a shelf of laundry detergent with a banner that says “For Mom.” What a gift! Utilitarian and insulting!

allformom

Beth spotted this ad while reading an article on USA Today’s site. Sure, it’s an okay gift, but not a traditional one.

USA today

Actually, this one almost would be a good idea for my mother, who still misses receiving a daily paper. She would prefer to read the local obituaries, though, so I’m not sure what appeal USA Today would have.

Finally, Nate spotted this promo on Best Buy’s virtual flyer:

image1

Out of the movies featured, there’s surely something that will appeal to just about anyone, but that doesn’t mean that gifting your mother a hit erotic movie is usually appropriate. Maybe in a few families…but if you’re a member of one of those families, you know it already.


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

9 Things We’re So Grateful Mom Taught Us About Money

http://ift.tt/1KwPgi2 Today is the day we pause to reflect on everything our mothers have given us, from kisses on scraped knees and comfortable laps to sit on, to financial wisdom that has the power to stick with us through adulthood. We asked you to share the personal finance tips your mother imparted to you, because hey, sharing is caring and she’d probably approve.

Happy Mother’s Day to all you mothers out there, and thank you for teaching us that the piggy bank will not replenish itself magically. Still disappointing, but good to hear it from you.

The roof over your head isn’t free forever

1. “When I turned 18, and still lived at home while working my way through school, I was charged rent. ‘That’s how the world works,’ my mom said.” — Jack

The future will arrive someday

2. “As soon as I landed my first full time job, my mom sent me to see the investment guy at the bank to set up an IRA and automatic contributions. She didn’t start saving until later in life and she wanted to make sure I got an early start.” — Anne

3. “Waste not, want not! Save before spending.” — @kshgoyal

4. “When I was six years old, I saw a doll advertised on the back of a cereal box that I really, really wanted. It probably cost about $3.00. My mother said that if I saved half the cost from my allowance, which was only about $.50 a week, she would match it. Ohhh that seemed like a long wait, but I probably appreciated the doll much more than if my mom had just bought it.

Likewise with my first bike, a used blue Schwinn. Mom matched half the price and I had to pay for the rest using my allowance and doing chores around the house. I loved that bike.

Saving and delayed gratification are valuable things to learn at an early age, and they stick.” — Pamela

5. “Never spend the principal; live off the interest.” — Jim

Know your limits

6. “My mother knew the value of a dollar, as she raised three kids using alimony and the pay from part-time jobs. ‘Never buy what you can’t afford.’ I’ve followed her lead on that, and pay my credit cards off every month.” — Jack

7. “Never spend more than what you have.” — @boringfileclerk

Money is a real thing

8. “I remember my mother always writing checks, and explaining to me when I asked that writing checks was the same as spending money, and you had to have the money in the bank if you were going to write a check.” — James

9. “When we were a bit older, mom introduced “funny money.” Doing chores would earn us pretend cash (she used Monopoly money) and when we got enough we could exchange it for some real money and earn a trip to the local dime store to buy ourselves a treat.” — C.E.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Friday, May 8, 2015

Stubborn Blue Bell Fan Keeps On Eating Potentially-Contaminated Ice Cream

http://ift.tt/1DWXD1d

bluebellIf your favorite ice cream were taken off shelves because it could cause a potentially fatal illness, would you keep eating it? One family in Texas refuses to throw out their stash of Blue Bell ice cream, because…well, they just don’t wanna.

Yes, one Blue Bell fan has two precious half-gallons of the ice cream in her freezer, eating a small amount once a week, anticipating the products’ return to shelves. How does she know that she won’t get sick? She doesn’t, of course. “I know the different symptoms with Listeria, so I’m hoping that I won’t catch it. It’s more of a faith thing,” she told TV station KHOU. Brand loyalty, unfortunately, is not enough to protect you from gastrointestinal illness.

The containers in her home haven’t made her sick yet, but that doesn’t mean that the rest of the half gallon is safe to eat, since the company and public health authorities still don’t know all of the products that could be contaminated. Maybe there’s a little bit at the bottom of the container she hasn’t encountered yet. A local epidemiologist told KHOU that continuing to eat Blue Bell ice cream in the freezer is a terrible idea.

It’s worth noting that this interview took place before the news broke that Listeria contamination was found in the company’s factories in Food and Drug Administration reports dating back to 2013, and that the company did nothing to find the source of bacteria found on equipment or make sure that ice cream wasn’t affected. That kind of news could affect even the most loyal user.

Die-hard Blue Bell fans not shying away from listeria concerns [KHOU]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Cable Company CEOs Now Say Net Neutrality Is Not A Threat To Their Business

http://ift.tt/1cgVqHI In the months leading up to the FCC’s vote on new net neutrality rules, the cable industry claimed that reclassifying broadband service to treat it more like a utility would harm investment and innovation (not to mention the outright lie that it would give control of the Internet to the government). Now that Neutrality is on the books (but still a few weeks away from being implemented), some of the biggest names in the cable industry are now shrugging their shoulders and saying it’s really not a big deal.

DSLreports.com does a great job today of rounding up recent comments from some of these CEOs who are now trying to quell the very concerns that their companies and industry trade groups helped to raise in the first place.

Like Comcast Cable CEO Neil Smit, who told a group of analysts that Title II reclassification “hasn’t affected the way we have been doing our business or will do our business.”

That’s a very different take on the matter than the statement made by Comcast immediately after the neutrality rules were approved by the FCC, when the company said that “we remain deeply concerned that implementing [neutrality] principles through Title II will do more harm to the vibrant Internet ecosystem than good.”

So Title II is harmful, but not to the largest Internet service provider in the country?

Time Warner Cable CEO Rob Marcus — who now has to actually run the company and won’t receive $80 million for just standing around while Comcast acquires it — also said that as long as the FCC uses Title II reclassification just to guarantee the core tenets of neutrality (no blocking, throttling, or expediting of content), “I think you won’t see a change in the way we do business.”

Thing is, that’s all the original 2010 neutrality rules tried to do. If Verizon hadn’t sued to gut them, the FCC wouldn’t have had to reclassify broadband.

Of course, while these companies are trying to calm investors who might actually be worried that there will be less innovation and investment because neutrality, they are leaving it up to industry trade groups to file lawsuits seeking to block reclassification.


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Man Thinks Random Lottery Ticket Words Insulting His Hometown Are No Accident

http://ift.tt/1cgVqHG

lottery ticketNew York’s current “Wheel of Fortune” branded instant lottery game seems pretty fun: you scratch off letters and reveal which are or aren’t on the game board. These words are supposed to be randomly generated, but one gambler is really upset at the state lottery after scratching off the words, “YOU/ELMIRA/TRASH.” You can probably guess where he lives.

The game categories here were “person, place, thing,” and those words do fit the categories. They are also a completely-formed insult, and the ticket containing that phrase happened to be sold in the city of Elmira (population 29,200) to a 22-year-old college student.

“At first, I thought someone was playing a trick on me with one of those fake lottery tickets, but I guess it was real,” he told the local newspaper. The owner of the bar where he bought the ticket agreed: she thought something was wrong and contacted the county sheriff’s office.

Local law enforcement and the state Gaming Commission checked out the ticket, determining that it was real and that no one had put that phrase together on purpose. In a statement, the gaming commission assures the public that they are not flinging hyper-regional insults at members of the public.

In a statement, the commission explains:

“The odds of these three words being selected in that particular order are 1 in 900 million. As soon as the ticket was brought to our attention, we immediately contacted the ticket printing vendor (IGT) to remove the word ‘trash’ from being a possible result for any future game. We apologize to anyone who was offended by this unfortunate result.”

Feeling trashed by a Lottery ticket [Star-Gazette]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Nearly 14% Of Zappos Staff Left After Company Implemented New Management System With No Bosses

http://ift.tt/1zLeBEt
(Kiim)

(Kiim)

Earlier this year, online shoe retailer Zappos unveiled a new management system that banished managers and job titles. While some employees might embrace a culture without a boss, more than 200 Zappos staffers decided to take a severance deal rather than continue working under the new boss-free model.

The Washington Post reports that 210 employees – about 14% of the company’s 1,500-person staff – took CEO Tony Hsieh up on his offer to quit with three months severance if they decided they didn’t like the new system.

The employees had until April 30 to make their decision, a deadline that was implemented to help speedup the adoption of no boss system.

While the company confirmed the exits, it declined to provide information on which employees took the offer, whether they were sales reps or previous managers and executives.

An employee who helped the company implement the new system says that employees chose to leave for a variety or reason.

“Some Zapponians took it because they are not in line with the vision of the company, others took it to pursue other passions including starting businesses,” he tells the Post. “Ultimately, however many people took the offer is the right number because they are doing what is best for them and for Zappos.”

Zappos new management system is part of a new concept called Holacracy, in which traditional corporate rankings are ousted in favor of self-governed teams, the Post reports.

In a memo when the program was first announced, CEO Hsieh said the goal was to make the company “a fully self-organized, self-managed organization by combining a variety of different tools and processes.”

The offer was similar to a previous deal the company provides to new employees, in which they can decide they aren’t a good match for the company and receive $2,000 to quit.

At Zappos, 210 employees decide to leave rather than work with ‘no bosses’ [The Washington Post]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66 Must Pay $11.5M To Settle Hazardous Waste Violations

http://ift.tt/1KS38Eg
(m01229)

(m01229)

Two Texas-based companies have been ordered to pay a total of $11.5 million to close the book on allegations that hundreds of their gas stations may have put local water supplies in California at risk.

The Associated Press reports the fine, shared by Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips, was handed down to resolve law enforcement allegations that the companies violated state laws governing the proper operation and maintenance of underground storage tanks used to store fuel at nearly 560 stores in state.

According to California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office, the two companies failed to comply with hazardous materials and hazardous waste laws beginning back in 2006.

The state’s complaint, which was filed in January 2013, claims Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips violated anti-pollution laws with respect to underground storage tanks by failing to properly maintain leak detection devices, test secondary containment systems, conduct monthly inspections, train employees in proper protocol, and maintain operational alarm systems, among other violations.

“Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips failed to adequately monitor hazardous materials in large gasoline holding tanks, which endangered nearby water supplies,” said Attorney General Harris. “This settlement holds Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips accountable for this dangerous negligence and will ensure future compliance with environmental laws.”

The investigation found violations of hazardous materials and hazardous waste laws and regulations at gas stations in 34 counties in the state.

In addition to paying the $11.5 million fine, the AG’s office says that the companies have since sold nearly all of their interests in the underground storage tanks in California.

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Announces $11.5 Million Settlement with Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips for Gas Tank Violations [California Attorney General]
2 gasoline companies ordered to pay $11.5M for violations [Santa Cruz Sentinel]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Report: Uber Bidding $3M For Nokia’s Maps Service

http://ift.tt/1H4gdcj After rumors earlier this year that Google was perhaps planning a ride-sharing service to rival Uber and Lyft, and that Uber was working on its own driverless cars, it comes as no surprise that Uber might be trying to disentangle itself from relying on Google’s mapping technology: A new report says the company may have bid up to $3 billion to acquire Nokia’s mapping services unit.

According to a report from the New York Times, Uber’s dependence on Google may change if its submitted bid for Here, the biggest competitor to Google Maps, is accepted.

Current owner Nokia announced last month it was considering off-loading the division, and is reportedly also fielding an offer from a group of German automakers — BMW, Audi and Mercedes-Benz — along with Chinese search engine Baidu, insiders told the NYT. A separate bid from a private equity firm is also said to be on the table, with Nokia expected to make a decision on the sale by the end of the month.

Though Google Maps has almost one billion mobile users, which is around 10 times the amount of Here’s users, Here has a big chunk of automobile mapping — it currently holds more than 80% of the global market share for built-in car navigation systems,.

Uber could use Here to boost services like UberPool, which pairs user data of riders with drivers, matching people up who are going the same way. Doing that quickly enough requires a lot of significant engineering power and plentiful mapping data, insiders explain to the NYT.

Uber Joins the Bidding for Here, Nokia’s Digital Mapping Service [New York Times]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Grocery Store Marks Down Chicken, Not Sure How ‘Clearance’ Works

http://ift.tt/1H6RVkQ

Here is how it works when something has been on the shelf for a while and you want to get rid of it. You lower the price slightly to entice someone to buy it, and…um, that should be about it. Unless you are grocer Ingles. Then putting something on clearance means raising the price per pound but decreasing the weight, decreasing the price slightly but not making anyone want to buy the chicken.

chicken

Reader Andy spotted this oddity. “Ingles supermarket seems to not know how clearance works, since they are clearing out this chicken for one cent more than regular price,” he writes. Ah, but they also don’t seem to understand how scales work, since the chicken has lost a little bit of weight since that original label was printed, even if it is wrapped in plastic. Someone needs to check the packaging on that chicken for safety reasons, the scale to make sure meat weights are accurate, or maybe both.


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Senators Urge Dept. Of Education To Provide Support To Students Affected By Corinthian Colleges Closure

http://ift.tt/1EVgNIL

Ever since now-bankrupt Corinthian Colleges Inc. began its downward spiral, consumer advocates, students and legislators have urged the powers that be to provide relief for students of Everest University, Heald College and WyoTech. Today, that plea continued as nine senators called on the Department of Education to provide support to the 16,000 students affected by the company’s final closure.

The letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan once again asks that the Dept. use its authority under the Higher Education Act to provide a closed school loan discharge to all eligible students.

Under the Higher Education Act, if a student attends a school slated for closure, or if that student withdrew within 120 days of the school closing, they may be entitled to a closed school discharge.

This means that the student would have no further obligation to repay their Direct Loans, Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program loans (which include Stafford and PLUS loans), or Perkins Loans.

The senators – including Barbara Boxer of California, Patty Murray of Washington, Dianne Feinstein of California, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Sherrod Brown of Ohio – also urge Duncan to use the Department’s authority to extend the 120 day withdraw window to accommodate students who may have left the school prior to the deadline.

“Former students ineligible for a closed school loan discharge may be able to assert a defense to repayment, due to Corinthian’s alleged fraudulent practices,” the letter states. “However, the Department of Education has not issued clear guidance on which students are eligible to assert a defense or the process for asserting a defense.”

The group also urged the Department to create a process in which all students are treated fairly by creating a consumer friendly process for borrowers’ to submit their discharge claims.

“Any defense to repayment or other process that may be announced should contain a simple and streamlined application process for borrowers who have been harmed, and should allow group claims to the maximum extent allowable under law,” the letter states. “While you work on the details of this potential process, you should also provide these borrowers interim relief through your authority to grant forbearances or suspend collection activities. Our first priority should be making sure we help these students any way we can.”

In addition to asking the Department to provide financial relief to former CCI students, the letter also asks Duncan to remove institutions under investigation for deceptive and fraudulent practices from a list of schools students could potentially transfer to.

Last week, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois criticized the Department for including an array of schools that have allegedly harmed students as “viable options” to continue their education.

Senators Urge Secretary of Education Arne Duncan To Provide Support To Students Affected By The Closure Of Corinthian Colleges [Barbara Boxer]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

The World’s Largest Catsup Bottle Is Still For Sale

http://ift.tt/1Eoy2P7 Dreams of uniting the World’s Largest Catsup bottle with the Oscar Mayer Wienermobile have proven to be just that, dreams: After a year on the market, the famous Collinsville, IL structure is still waiting for its soul mate to arrive with $500,000.

Last year Oscar Meyer got our– er, the Brooks Catsup Bottle’s hopes up when a company representative said the possibility of purchasing the historic landmark was a very really one.

“The brand has been in touch with the bottle’s owner, and while they’re still in the early exploratory stage, both parties are very excited about the possibility,” an Oscar Mayer rep said then.

But lo, there’s no buyer in sight, reports KMOX News, which means the bottle’s future is uncertain. One of the volunteers trying to save it, who goes by Big Tomato, says there hasn’t been any serious interest in almost a year, after that first rush of publicity.

“Being in the historic preservation world, we know unfortunately that (it being on the National Registry of Historic Places) doesn’t always save a landmark,” Big Tomato told KMOX.

Ongoing construction on a state route nearby prompted the July 12 World’s Largest Catsup Bottle Festival to move to an area away from the bottle, after organizers said they “threw in the towel” trying to deal with the complication.

Collinsville World’s Largest Catsup Bottle Still for Sale [KMOX News]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

California Says Alleged Recycling Scam Trucked In Bottles & Cans From Arizona For $14M In Illegal Refunds

http://ift.tt/1KqIU3L It might just be a bunch of bottles and cans, but when you get enough recyclables together it can mean a hefty wad of cash. California authorities say a group involved in an alleged illegal recycling scheme was flush with $14 million in refunds after trucking roughly 250 million cans and bottles from out of state and redeeming them.

A grand jury indicted five California residents on charges including grand theft and recycling fraud in March, reports the Associated Press, but the details of the case were just announced Thursday by California’s Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, or CalRecycle.

Officials also say more than a dozen private recycling centers in Southern California are on the hook for playing a part in the scam, because they accepted the Arizona recyclables. Though all centers are responsible for determining where a container came from, in this case those involved were operated by or in cahoots with the fraud ring, CalRecycle noted.

In April 2014, Department of Justice agents “witnessed a semi-truck being loaded with used beverage containers” in Phoenix and then followed it to a dirt lot in Bakersfield, where the containers were moved to a trailer and a U-Haul truck, and eventually taken to a recycling center in the city.
That operation led to investigators uncovering what they call a scam involving recycling centers redeeming bottles and cans from Arizona from 2012 to 2014.

So why is it illegal to bring Arizona cans to California for cash? Money refunded for containers in California is given out based on the fact that there was an original $0.05-$0.10 charge to buy that bottle or can, marked as a California Redemption Value claim on containers. But if the can comes from Arizona, that means it was purchased there and thus not subject to that initial California charge.

“Californians rightly expect us to act aggressively to combat CRV fraud,” CalRecycle Director Caroll Mortensen said. “These indictments send a clear message to anyone who thinks they can cheat the system by illegally cashing in on out-of-state containers through fraudulent CRV redemptions.”

California says it busted $14M can, bottle recycling scheme [Associated Press]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

JPMorgan Chase, Bank Of America Agree To Wipe Debt Cleared By Bankruptcy From Credit Reports

http://ift.tt/1EopRCk

Two of the country’s largest banks are finally getting around to removing the debt consumers eliminated during bankruptcy proceedings from their credit reports, a move that puts Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase in line with federal law.

The New York Times reports that the banks have agreed to update borrowers’ credit reports over the next three months, providing needed relief for about a million consumers.

Under federal law, when someone erases a debt in bankruptcy, their bank is required to update their credit reports to indicate the debt is no longer owed. But according to several lawsuits, many of the country’s largest banks have been disregarding those rules, leading to inaccurate and unfair red marks on credit reports.

Instead, the financial companies allegedly ignored the discharges in order to make money by selling off the debt to collectors, who then refused to correct issues unless borrowers paid the debts that were already cleared, the Times reports.

While JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America agreed to correct credit reports, neither company is admitting any wrongdoing as part of the deal.

JPMorgan plans to ensure that all debts discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy are correctly recorded on credit reports by August.

For its part, Bank of America plans to change the way it reports all extinguished debts that are sold to financial firms. Additionally, the company say all credit card debts sold since May 2007 will be removed from consumers’ credit reports.

Bank of American and JPMorgan Chase aren’t the only banks doing battle in court over the issues. Citigroup and Synchrony Financial also face lawsuits alleging they deliberately ignored bankruptcy discharges.

Synchrony agreed last year to provide relief similar to that of JPMorgan and Bank of America.

According to the Times, the banks tried repeatedly to have the lawsuits thrown out, but all of those attempts have so far been refused.

In the case against Citigroup, the judge criticized the company for not chaining the way it reports debts to credit reporting agencies, saying the he believes the only reason the bank hasn’t rectified its process is because “t makes money off of it.”

In a statement to the Times, Citigroup said it takes the issue seriously, and has made a proposal to plaintiffs that falls in line with what other banks have done.

Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase Agree to Erase Debts From Credit Reports After Bankruptcies [The New York Times]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Amazon Wants Its Delivery Drones To Track Customers Down Wherever They Are

http://ift.tt/1KREgMW Is it sometimes inconvenient and/or annoying to await the arrival of a package at home, or have it sent to your place of work? Yes. Do you want a drone finding your location via smartphone and dropping a package wherever you happen to be? Perhaps, though we can see some settings where Amazone’s idea for its delivery drones might get a bit awkward.

Amazon details its idea in a patent for an “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Delivery System” (via BBC), including the ability for drones to track the location of the person it’s bringing a package to using data pulled from their smartphones.

And like a bunch of commuter birds in flight, the drones will also be able to chat with each other about the weather and traffic conditions, allowing them to update their routes in real time.

The drones would also constantly be monitoring for humans or other animals that might cross its path, and adjust accordingly.

As for the actual moment of delivery, it’s not like you’ll be sitting in the park in the midst of a bad break-up, only to be bonked on the head by your new Xbox or something. Instead, customers will be able to choose from delivery options like “bring it to me” or instead choosing to have it go to their home, workplace or for example, “my boat.”

This does bring into play the question of the “porch” temptation — what’s to keep interlopers from nabbing the packages before they reach their intended recipient? Ostensibly, that’s also something Amazon would be working out.

The patent also outlines a plan where Amazon uses different kinds of unmanned vehicles depending on the package’s shape and weight. I now see a future of “drone-watching” — complete with books describing the various species of unmanned aerial vehicles.

“Oh look, honey! It’s a gold-bellied Amazon drone!”

Of course, just having a patent doesn’t mean that the final result will be identical to the description. There are plenty of legal regulations still being worked out to govern what drones can do and where they can go. And it’s only been a month since the Federal Aviation Administration gave Amazon and other companies approval to test drones, so the future of drone deliveries could still be a few years away.

Amazon details drone delivery plans [BBC]
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE DELIVERY SYSTEM [U.S. Patent & Trademark Office]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Delta Passengers Get Free Pizza After Plane Cabin Fills With Smoke During Flight

http://ift.tt/1DWkZ74 It can’t be fun to be flying miles above the Earth and then have the plane cabin fill up with smoke. But passengers on a Delta Air Lines flight who had to sit through a bit of a scare until when one of their plane’s engines reportedly went out at least got free pizza when the plane landed to soothe any frayed nerves.

Late on Thursday, a Delta plane flying from Fort Lauderdale to New York was diverted to Charleston, S.C. “after a performance issue with one of the Boeing MD-88 aircraft’s two engines was observed,” an airline spokesman told ABC News, adding that the plane landed safely and taxied to a gate.

Passengers reported a smoky mid-air scene that caused some alarm, including a 60 Minutes producer who happened to be on the flight and shot video of the smoke in the cabin. She told CBS News the captain informed the 89 passengers onboard he’d shut down one of the engines.

“We could hear the beeping of the smoke alarm and it was pretty quickly — the cabin was filling up with smoke pretty quickly — so yeah, it was a little nerve wracking,” she said. “They told all of us to put our heads down in our laps because the air would be fresher.”

Another passenger who spoke to ABC News shot video after the plane had landed, with the hashtag #neveradullday:

Delta provided pizza and beverage for the travelers passing the time in Charleston before getting another plane to take them to New York’s LaGuardia Airport around four hours late. Because everyone knows hot, melty cheese can help ease the mind, not to mention the stomach.

“Delta’s top priority on every flight is safety and apologizes for the delay,” the spokesman added.

Delta Flight From Florida Diverted After Smoke Fills Cabin [ABC News]
Delta passenger’s “scariest flight ever” [CBS News]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Company Behind M&M’s, Snickers Endorses “Added Sugars” Label For Foods

http://ift.tt/1DWkZ70 Of all the companies to advocate for alerting consumers to added sugars, the country’s most famous candy maker would be probably be among the least likely. But yesterday, Mars Inc. — the company behind M&M’s, Snickers, Milky Way, and Twix — gave its corporate stamp of approval to the idea of limiting the use of added sugars and labeling those products that contain extra sugar.

In a letter [PDF] to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Mars gave its endorsement to recommendations from regulators to measurements for added sugars to products’ Nutrition Facts labels.

“The world’s leading health authorities — including the World Health Organization (WHO), the US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, and the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition — have recommended that people limit their intake their intake of sugars, particularly those added to foods, to no more than 10% of total energy/caloric intake,” writes Mars in a statement. “Mars supports this recommendation.”

Mars says it currently limits its products to 250 calories per serving, but that it will seek to add more products with fewer than 200 calories/serving.

Jim O’Hara, Health Promotion Policy Director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, applauded Mars for publicly supporting these regulatory recommendations.

“Consumers need to know how much added sugar is in their food and beverages to make healthy choices,” says O’Hara. “The best way to do that is having an ‘added sugars’ line on Nutrition Facts panels to distinguish those sugars from the naturally occurring sugars in fruit or milk ingredients… As the process continues, we hope Mars will show continued leadership on other reforms such as expressing added sugars in teaspoons, not just in grams.”


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

FDA Investigators: Blue Bell Found Bacteria Issues At Production Facilities Two Years Ago, Failed To Act

http://ift.tt/1DcgF4l
(Kusine)

(Kusine)

A few weeks ago the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that the current Blue Bell listeria outbreak that has been linked to three deaths and at least 10 illness in four states to illnesses that occurred at least five years ago. Now, federal investigators claim the Texas-based ice cream maker knew of bacteria problems at its plants nearly two years ago, but failed to do anything about it.

The Houston Chronicle reports that recently released documents [PDF] from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration show Blue Bell’s own repeated testing programs found traces of listeria at the company’s Broken Arrow, OK plant.

According to the FDA, the testing, which included five samples in 2013, 10 in 2014 and two in 2015, found traces of listeria on floors, pallets used to store and carry ingredients and other non-food-contact surfaces at the plant.

Despite the repeated findings, the company allegedly did nothing to find the cause of the contamination, or further check surfaces that do come into contact with the ice cream products.

Tests in 2014 and 2015 indicated high levels of coliform – another kind of bacteria – along the entire production process, violating the limits under Oklahoma law, the Chronicle reports.

Recent FDA inspections of Blue Bell plants – occurring after the outbreak was first announced in March – found dirty conditions including condensation inside the plant dripping into ice cream containers, cleaning water that wasn’t hot enough, dirty pallets with “mold-like residue and red stains,” and black “mold-like material” on equipment used to freeze ice cream.

Additionally, the inspection found that procedures used by the company to clean and sanitize equipment and surfaces was not adequate.

“Specifically, you failed to demonstrate your cleaning and sanitizing program is effective in controlling recurring microbiological contaminations,” the report states. “You continued to have presumptive positive environmental test results for Listeria and elevated total coliform results following the daily cleaning and sanitizing treatments of your equipment and facilities.”

Food safety consultant Larry Keener tells the Chronicle that in a routine inspection, FDA representatives might not include such issues in its report.

“But given the outbreak, the scrutiny is intensified, and every item or infraction, small or large, is noted,” he says.

While the issues described above occurred at the Oklahoma plant, which was temporarily closed earlier this spring, the FDA reported similar issues at two other plants in Alabama [PDF] and Texas [PDF]. Those plants have also been closed.

Despite the findings by the FDA, investigators say they still haven’t determined how listeria actually entered the ice cream, leading to the outbreak and massive recall.

Officials with Blue Bell confirm that company testing found issues starting in 2013.

“Several swab tests did show the presence of listeria on nonfood surfaces in Blue Bell’s Broken Arrow (Oklahoma) plant in 2013,” company spokesman Joe Robertson said in an email. “As is standard procedure for any such positive results, the company would immediately clean the surfaces and swab until the tests were negative. We thought our cleaning process took care of any problems, but in hindsight, it was not adequate, which is why we are currently conducting such a comprehensive re-evaluation of all our operations.”

The company says it is preparing detailed responses to the FDA findings and plans to take steps to upgrade testing and employee training.

In a separate statement on Thursday, Blue Bell announced it doesn’t expect its ice cream products to return to retailer shelves for several more months, the Montgomery Advertiser reports.

“The extensive and detailed process of updating, cleaning and sanitizing our four production facilities, as well as training employees and implementing new programs and procedures, will take longer than we initially anticipated,” the company said in a statement. “Each facility will have its own timetable and production may resume in some locations before others.”

The company, which has recalled more than 8 million gallons of ice cream since March, says that ensuring products are safe is of the utmost priority, even if that means shelves remain empty for several more months.

“Unfortunately, we do not yet have a firm timeline for when Blue Bell ice cream will be back in stores, but we believe at this time that it will be several months at a minimum,” Paul Kruse, Blue Bell CEO and President, said in a statement.

Blue Bell Ice Cream won’t return soon [Montgomery Advertiser]
FDA: Blue Bell knew of listeria, didn’t correct problems [Houston Chronicle]

 


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Why Is This Store Charging Bottle Deposit On Dryer Sheets?

http://ift.tt/1P64voD
(Communicore 82)

(Communicore 82)

Some consumer mysteries are very tiny, which is what makes them somehow even more frustrating. For example, why did a bodega charge a customer ten cents in bottle deposit fees when she bought laundry supplies? The store was somehow charging the deposit on dryer sheets, but not charging it on beverages which should be subject to it. Why? The store say that it was all a mistake.

Well, that explanation makes sense. It might be baffling to some people people that someone would contact a TV consumer reporter over ten cents, but it bothered this laundry-doer that the store might be charging bottle deposit, or CRV, on items for which consumers couldn’t get it back.

If your state doesn’t have such a program, it’s simple: to incentivize people to recycle certain kinds of bottles and cans, stores collect a five-cent deposit on each container (ten cents in some states, as viewers of “Seinfeld” know) which the customer gets back by bringing the container to a store or bottle redemption center. This is supposed to be programmed into cash registers or store computers at purchase, and in the case of this store wasn’t.

Call Kurtis Investigates: Why Was I Charged Deposit for Recyclables on Dryer Sheets? [CBS Sacramento]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Even $100,000 Diamond Encrusted Watches Can End Up At The TSA Lost & Found

http://ift.tt/1JvVi2d
We can’t help but be curious about the person who managed to forget he or she was wearing a $100,000 diamond encrusted Cartier watch and walk away from a security checkpoint that much lighter. Yes, that is a thing that can happen. [TSA on Instagram]
by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

You Can Now Order Food Delivery Through Google Search Results On Your Phone

http://ift.tt/1IVnddG An empty belly and no desire to cook is no problem in an age of instant, Internet-fueled gratification, and now Google is taking another step out of the occasion. Anyone searching for food or restaurants nearby for delivery or takeout using the search engine on their phone will now see an option to “Place an order” next to some results.

It’s not much of a leap, after all, as Google has simply teamed up with a slew of online food delivery services to add the ordering option to its results, depending on where you live.

Searching for a nearby restaurant on your phone will pull up the option to order. Tapping on that will bring hungry folks to a selection of delivery services — depending on what operates in your area and works wwith that restaurant — taking users to that website to complete the order.
googlefood
The six providers on the U.S. list for services include Seamless, Grubhub, Eat24, Delivery.com, BeyondMenu and MyPizza.com, with Google noting that it’s looking to add more eventually.

It’s unclear whether this functionality will also roll out for those using desktop browsers to search Google, however, or if it’ll stick strictly with mobile devices.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Walmart Taking Over Target’s Canadian Properties

http://ift.tt/1EnQ2t7

The big box locations that once served as Target stores in Canada now have a new tenant: Walmart.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Walmart will acquire the retail and distribution locations vacated by Target earlier this year.

In all, the retailer will add 12 store leases and one owned property, as well as one distribution center to its roster of 395 stores already operating in the great North.

“Walmart is committed to the Canadian market, and this agreement helps us accelerate our growth plans,” Walmart Canada Chief Executive Dirk Van den Berghe tells the WSJ.

Walmart’s plans to take over the locations and property comes about five months after Target announced it would cease operations in Canada.

This is the second expansion in Canada for Walmart this year. Back in February the company announced it would open 29 supercenter stores in the country.

Wal-Mart to Buy Canadian Locations From Target [The Wall Street Journal]


by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Consumerist Friday Flickr Finds

http://ift.tt/1EUHPQs

Here are twelve of the best photos that readers added to the Consumerist Flickr Pool in the last two weeks, picked for usability in a Consumerist post or for just plain neatness.

Want to see your pictures on our site? Our Flickr pool is the place where Consumerist readers upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click “Join Group?” up on the top right. Choose your best photos, then click “send to group” on the individual images you want to add to the pool.


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist